Journal Articles
Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology
16 September 2025
In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid ‘cookie cutter science’ and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Discover
Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology
Journal Articles
Correction to ‘Digital advances for multicentre studies – the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) experience’
04 November 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Utility of the European Association of Urology risk stratification recommendation to predict likelihood of future kidney stone events
04 November 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Comment on: ‘The role of PSA density in the follow up of men with a negative MRI in the Göteborg‐2 trial’
04 November 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Reply to the Wang et al. Comment on: ‘The role of PSA density in the follow up of men with a negative MRI in the Göteborg‐2 trial’
04 November 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Pelvic sleeve pyeloplasty in adults: A technical refinement of Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty
03 November 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
The impact of programmed death ligand 1 expression on prognosis in penile cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
03 November 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
The impact of 5‐alpha reductase inhibitors on multiparametric MRI diagnostic performance and prostate‐specific antigen density triage: A systematic review
31 October 2026
Discover