Journal Articles
Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology
16 September 2025
In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid ‘cookie cutter science’ and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Discover
Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology
Journal Articles
Intraoperative margin assessment using fluorescence confocal microscopy during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: a first experience
25 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI for indeterminate testicular lesions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
25 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Response to the Li et al. comment on ‘Overall survival benefit after prophylactic urethrectomy: true oncological effect or unadjusted selection bias?’
24 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Comment on ‘Overall survival benefit after prophylactic urethrectomy: true oncological effect or unadjusted selection bias?’
24 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Active surveillance in the elderly: Is it the right strategy to avoid overtreatment?
24 March 2026
DiscovereLearning
Free taster module: When is active surveillance for the small renal mass appropriate?
03 March 2026
Discover