Journal Articles
Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology
16 September 2025
In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid ‘cookie cutter science’ and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Discover
Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology
Journal Articles
Digital pathology‐based artificial intelligence algorithms in prostate cancer: inside the ‘black box’
06 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Exercise, nutrition, and psychological support for kidney cancer: a scoping review
06 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab induces durable response in microsatellite instability‐high and DNA damage repair‐deficient metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer
06 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Standardized care pathway reshaped the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of urinary bladder cancer. A 15‐year population‐based study
05 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Treatment outcomes of multidisciplinary management of recurrent urinary tract infections: A 2‐year experience in a dedicated complex‐UTI clinic
05 March 2026
DiscovereLearning
Free taster module: When is active surveillance for the small renal mass appropriate?
03 March 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Preoperative predictors of adverse pathology and recurrence‐free survival for patients with renal masses
28 February 2026
DiscoverJournal Articles
Prevention of lymphoceles using peritoneal flaps during robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
27 February 2026
Discover